alt Hacker NewsThere is no evidence that what you say is true. A tweet is not a legally binding statement.
Replies
>A tweet is not a legally binding statement.
In the recent Supreme Court hearing over the firing of Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve, the administration is acting like Truth Social posts are official notices.
>Several justices have noted the unusual nature of the case before it, which began with a post by Trump on his social media platform, Truth Social, that said he would fire Cook.
>Jackson wondered why that would be considered sufficient notice: “How is it that we can assume that she’s on social media?”
https://apnews.com/live/supreme-court-lisa-cook-federal-rese...
It will be true as soon as it becomes official though, assuming they actually go through with it and this is not just a bargaining tactic.
When did legality apply to this administration?
What part? Are you doubting that they are being designated as a supply chain risk? Or the implications of being designated as one?
We do have a recent example with Huawei, and it did fall just like this - and that was just some hardware.