> You've confused and confabulated like 11 different things there.

Feel free to elaborate. As it stands that's nothing more than name calling.

I wasn't speaking to the current CA or CO proposed implementations (which I don't support as it happens). I responded specifically to your statement:

> It's not that it's difficult, it's that it's arbitrary and a form of commanded speech or action.

My response being that I think it's acceptable for the regulator to require action under certain limited circumstances.