Overly enthusiastic Rust evangelists can be annoying, but nowhere as much as C++ or C advocates defensively claiming memory safety isn't a big deal, and they are going to have it in the next version of the language anyway.
I find my experience with Erlang has helped with the (considerable) learning curve for Rust, but I still prefer Go for most use-cases.
> claiming memory safety isn't a big deal
There are contexts where it is, there are contexts where it is not.
But suddenly everyone out there is dealing only with those context where it is.