logoalt Hacker News

gman83yesterday at 3:04 PM10 repliesview on HN

This wasn't due to some random Gemini request. Users were using sketchy antigravity auth plugins to use their antigravity tokens on things like OpenClaw, clearly against ToS. It's great that Google is giving these users a second chance.


Replies

amiga386yesterday at 3:08 PM

Yes, our masters once again embarrass us unworthy peons with their endless grace, generosity and forebearance. How lucky we are to entrust our data and our lives to them!

show 2 replies
exitbyesterday at 3:12 PM

If a 3rd party product advertises compatibility with a Google service and you use it to login via a first party Google login page, doesn’t the responsibility fall somewhere between the offending product and Google itself? In practice it’s structured pretty much like a phishing attempt.

Notably some model providers explicitly allow that very flow, while others will ban you without notice.

show 1 reply
zarzavatyesterday at 3:12 PM

Okay but they were paying customers paying $$$ for the service. Banning your customers without prior warning is not right, however sketchy their behaviour might appear. Even if it's obvious to Google that there's a difference between a Gemini API key and an Antigravity API key, it's not necessarily obvious to others.

The correct and sane thing to do is to send them an email, with at most a 24 hour suspension. If they keep doing it despite being warned then by all means fire them.

crawshawyesterday at 3:08 PM

The concern is not losing access to some new IDE for operating outside the terms of service. The concern is when you lose access to the IDE, you also lose access to your 20 year old Gmail account.

A general problem for Google products is that everything is mixed together.

show 1 reply
johnebgdyesterday at 3:07 PM

It’s be great if Google just revoked antigravity access if terms were violated. No need to disable the entire account.

show 4 replies
theturtletalksyesterday at 9:57 PM

They were banning people and those people couldn’t even cancel their subscription. That’s a rookie mistake and you expect the same company to have a flawless ban system?

jamesnordenyesterday at 3:31 PM

>It's great that Google is giving these users a second chance.

I hope this is sarcasm. A permaban as the first action is never a good idea.

NicuCalceayesterday at 3:17 PM

When's the last time you read the ToS of a service you signed up for?

show 1 reply
sneakyesterday at 5:28 PM

Telling your users they can't use certain software to access your HTTP API is exactly the same as telling people they can't use certain browsers to load https://google.com.

982307932084yesterday at 3:37 PM

"Hey Gemini, write a short blurb casting our capriciousness in a good light."