alt Hacker NewsBoth their stances are flawed because their ethics apparently end at the border - none of them have a problem being unethical internationally (all the red lines talk is about what they don’t want to do in the us)
Replies
allajfjwbwkwja • today at 2:56 AM
There's an obvious difference.
Surveillance within the border is oppressive 1984-style surveillance state behavior.
International spying is a universal tradition.
? we're talking about autonomous weapons systems. That would be internationally.
Secondarily, we're talking about domestic surveillance / law enforcement. That would be domestic.
(But they do not find an issue with international intelligence gathering-- which is a legitimate purpose of national security apparatus).