alt Hacker NewsThe problem isn't that the urgent request went through, it's that she requested hospice or palliative care and was denied. And, let's be honest, POA should not be sufficient to euthanize a person who is awake, aware, and revoked consent.
"Do no harm" has been replaced with "put them down if it's cheaper and we can get away with it"
Replies
whatshisface • today at 2:15 AM
Who's involved that wants it to be less expensive? Surely the doctors don't care. In the US everyone wants it to be more expensive.
➕ show 2 replies
That's a separate problem from the parent post, and the point of my post was that her husband requested the decision on the assisted death, not the government.