I was looking for an analogy and this is a good one.

The noise to signal ratio seems so bad. You’d have to sift through every little “thought”. If I could record my thought stream would I add it to the commit? Hell no.

Now, a summary of the reasoning, assumptions made and what alternatives were considered? Sure, that makes for a great message.

If you archive the session, you automatically archive all Google search history (queries and outputs) that the AI did, and it's usually relevant to the project.

And not all google searches you do while working on that commit may even be related to that commit. It may be entirely unrelated, or sensitive information that should not be made public.