alt Hacker NewsAuthor writes an interesting, nuanced, wide-reaching essay about AI and society, with a main theme being about AI and its impact on our humanity.
All other top level arguments offer AI summaries that miss all of the interesting, nuanced, wide-reaching topics about AI and its impact on our humanity, and complain it was too long to read.
Truly a gem of irony.
No it's not. Even if the guy has valid points, it's shit writing. The first paragraph of any piece of text should be a summary so that the reader can decide whether to move forward or fuck off. Here the author says "if you follow me like apostles followed Jesus then please stay, if you don't then fuck off, I have zero interest convincing you to stay" a'igt, I bounce.
Reminds me of literature lessons in high school where the teacher would explain why given book is exceptionally important while for me it was exceptionally boring but I had to take part in this theatre where I need to pretend that the book is indeed flawless.
The true gem of irony is that the author could really benefit from an LLM which could review his text before publishing. It's not 1920 where people read everything they have access to multiple times over and over because text on its own is rare. It's 2026 and before I engage with your work, you need to convince me that it's not slop.