Because you think that "being able to track leadership of a country that knows that other countries may want to target them" does not mean "being able to track pretty much anyone"?

Or do you think that those cameras are less secure because the leadership is not good with their people?

I'm not sure I follow the criticism here.

Why not? China is taking notes, it's merely a matter of time before the shoe is on the other foot: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_Typhoon

I overall agree with your point, but I don’t think defending a country engaged in a genocide is a strong supporting argument…