logoalt Hacker News

hightrixtoday at 12:35 AM6 repliesview on HN

While I'd like to agree with you, and do in some cases, there are many cases where this just isn't a feasible approach. For example, a peer coworker has a pair of these. I just don't interact with her while she is wearing them. If my boss were to get a pair there is no way I can justify slapping them off his face.


Replies

DrewADesigntoday at 1:01 AM

It’s also at least simple assault, and quite possibly aggravated assault on someone that has a sophisticated camera pointed at your face that’s sending biometrics, images, and probably video back to one of the worst privacy offenders on the planet.

Feels great to say it. Would feel great to do it. Morally defensible to anyone that knows anything about privacy if the person isn’t low-vision or something. In reality, a terrifically stupid idea.

show 2 replies
dylan604today at 1:00 AM

I don't think you could justify slapping them off of anybody's face unless you really just like to assault people.

show 1 reply
miki123211today at 12:41 AM

They're incredibly popular in the blind community, and for good reason.

I think even the political activists will be extremely divided on this one. You have privacy on one hand, accessibility and a genuinely life-changing technology on the other.

show 6 replies
lacunarytoday at 12:45 AM

does your workplace allow recording coworkers without their permission?

show 1 reply
tartorantoday at 12:42 AM

You could always say you're not comfortable being processed and uploaded to Meta. If they wear the glasses at their desks replacing their screen , that's fair game.

show 1 reply
__MatrixMan__today at 1:09 AM

I would acquit