logoalt Hacker News

deauxtoday at 4:50 AM8 repliesview on HN

Why was the title changed from "The workers behind Meta’s smart glasses can see everything" to "A hidden workforce behind Meta’s new smart glasses"? It doesn't go against any guidelines:

> Please don't do things to make titles stand out, like using uppercase or exclamation points, or saying how great an article is. It's implicit in submitting something that you think it's important.

> If the title includes the name of the site, please take it out, because the site name will be displayed after the link.

> If the title contains a gratuitous number or number + adjective, we'd appreciate it if you'd crop it. E.g. translate "10 Ways To Do X" to "How To Do X," and "14 Amazing Ys" to "Ys." Exception: when the number is meaningful, e.g. "The 5 Platonic Solids."

> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.

The literal URL slug is

> metas-ai-smart-glasses-and-data-privacy-concerns-workers-say-we-see-everything

The page title is

> Meta’s AI Smart Glasses and Data Privacy Concerns: Workers Say “We See Everything”

The new title goes against the guidelines by editorializing. I've never seen HN do this before, what's going on here?


Replies

tomhowtoday at 5:34 AM

Terms like "hidden" and "see everything" are in a title are clickbait. That's why the title would have been changed.

I've changed it again to match the article's original title, removing the clickbait part.

show 1 reply
tobrtoday at 5:39 AM

For the record, now it has changed again, to ’Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns’, which is even more milquetoast.

Parent and another comment reacting to this change have also been (artificially, I must assume) sunk from top to below gems like ’Too funny that the subcontractor working for meta is “sama”’.

disqardtoday at 5:04 AM

I'm with you. I thought the title captured and represented the OG article accurately.

What's going on?

incompatibletoday at 5:33 AM

Now it's "Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns", which is a little vague.

Gnadgnadtoday at 5:26 AM

It's very telling that this post has been sent straight to the bottom.

Gnadgnadtoday at 5:19 AM

This tells us Meta's strategic focus for the next several quarters. This must hit a very expensive nerve.

camillomillertoday at 5:09 AM

@dang do you care explaining? This looks really terrible.