logoalt Hacker News

worldsaviortoday at 3:34 PM3 repliesview on HN

If AGI will ever come, then. Currently, AI is only a statistical machines, and solutions like this are purely based on distribution and no logic/actual intelligence.


Replies

zarzavattoday at 4:08 PM

I swear that AI could independently develop a cure for cancer and people would still say that it's not actually intelligent, just matrix multiplications giving a statistically probable answer!

LLMs are at least designed to be intelligent. Our monkey brains have much less reason to be intelligent, since we only evolved to survive nature, not to understand it.

We are at this moment extremely deep into what most people would have been considered to be actual artificial intelligence a mere 15 years ago. We're not quite at human levels of intelligence, but it's close.

show 3 replies
rustyhancocktoday at 3:39 PM

I don't even think that's the issue.

The issue to my mind is a lack of data at the meeting of QFT/GR.

Afterall few humans historically have been capable of the initial true leap between ontologies. But humans are pretty smart so we can't say that is a requirement for AGI.

show 2 replies
bobbylarrybobbytoday at 4:15 PM

Did you read the linked paper? Claude out-reasoned humans on a challenging (or at least, unsolved) math problem.

show 2 replies