logoalt Hacker News

ranyumetoday at 4:20 AM5 repliesview on HN

This might be off-topic but on-topic about child safety... but I'm surprised people are being myopic about age verification. Age verification should be banned, but people ignore that nowadays most widely used online services already ask for your age and act accordingly: twitter, youtube, google in general, any online marketplace. They already got so much data on their users and optimize their algorithms for those groups in an opaque way.

So yeah, age verification should be taken down, as well as the datamining these companies do and the opaque tunning of their algorithms. It baffles me: people are concerned about their children's DMs but are not concerned about what companies serves them and what they do with their data.


Replies

nandomrumbertoday at 6:15 AM

> people are concerned about their children's DMs but are not concerned about what companies serves them and what they do with their data.

Hogwash.

Where are these mythical people who aren’t concerned with both?

Dban1today at 6:42 AM

I thought it was common knowledge to just set your birthdate to 1970 or something

show 1 reply
Nursietoday at 6:13 AM

> Age verification should be banned

Why?

> They already got so much data on their users

There are a variety of ways (see "Verifiable Credentials") that ages can be verified without handing over any data other than "Is old enough" to social media services.

show 2 replies
LoganDarktoday at 4:42 AM

Monitoring children's DMs is the responsibility of the parents, not megacorps. If a parent wants to install a keylogger or screen recorder on their child's PC, that's their decision. But Google should not be able to. Neither should... literally anyone else except maybe an employer on a work-provided device.

show 5 replies