logoalt Hacker News

staticassertiontoday at 8:28 AM2 repliesview on HN

When it comes to novel work, LLMs become "fast typers" for me and little more. They accelerate testing phases but that's it. The bar for novelty isn't very high either - "make this specific system scale in a way that others won't" isn't a thing an LLM can ever do on its own, though it can be an aid.

LLMs also are quite bad for security. They can find simple bugs, but they don't find the really interesting ones that leverage "gap between mental model and implementation" or "combination of features and bugs" etc, which is where most of the interesting security work is imo.


Replies

asadmtoday at 8:34 AM

I think your analysis is a bit outdated these days or you may be holding it wrong.

I am doing novel work with codex but it does need some prompting ie. exploring possibilities from current codebase, adding papers to prompt etc.

For security, I think I generally start a new thread before committing to review from security pov.

show 1 reply
truetravellertoday at 11:04 AM

This is basically my take as well!