I see similar arguments and I don't agree as well, here is why:

> rehire people with the skills we want in a year or two than it is to try and retrain.

before that future comes your company might become obsolete already, because you have lost your market share to new entrants

> We expect the bottlenecks in our org to move from writing code to something else

I would love to tell them, hey lets leverage current momentum and build, when those times come, we offer existing people with accumulated knowledge to retrain to a new type of work, if they think they're not good fit, they can leave, if they're willing, give them a chance, invest in people, make them feel safe and earn trust and loyalty from them

> AI tools are expensive so until the increased productivity translates to increased revenue we need to make room in the budget

1. Its not that expensive: 150$/seat/month -> 5 lunches? or maybe squeeze it from Sales personnel traveling with Business class?

2. By the time increased productivity is realized by others, company who resisted could be so far behind, that they won't be able to afford hiring engineers with those skillsets, if they think 150$ is expensive now, I am sure they will say "What??? 350k$ for this engineer?, no way, I will instead hire contractors"