logoalt Hacker News

whywhywhywhyyesterday at 10:25 AM6 repliesview on HN

Begging open source projects to stop with the libre<name> convention, it's awkward to say, it's cringe and seems to spiritually doom a project to fail.


Replies

kleibayesterday at 11:59 AM

The "libre" terms originates from the "free software" movement which does not like the term "open source" on philosophical grounds. In English, "free" has multiple meanings, and the romance language-derived "libre" was chosen in the past to distinguish the movement's ideals from the use of "free as in beer".

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html

show 2 replies
Dwedityesterday at 10:36 AM

One example that really sticks in my mind was "Libreboot". Yes, it's supposed to represent a free BIOS/booting system. But it also sounds like the name of a library dedicated to rebooting your computer.

show 1 reply
madduciyesterday at 11:20 AM

At least they signal that the project is open and free. What about projects using "Open" but they aren't? (See: OpenAI)

abirchyesterday at 12:22 PM

Almost any name is better than GIMP.

show 1 reply
PowerElectronixyesterday at 10:28 AM

That's like asking a EU product to not be named Euro-{product}.

show 1 reply
progxyesterday at 11:05 AM

LibreOffice ?

show 1 reply