logoalt Hacker News

yorwbatoday at 1:06 PM4 repliesview on HN

People could always simply argue in court that their torrenting was free use.

If you're just some nobody representing yourself instead of an expensive lawyer acting on behalf of a large company, maybe the judge will even try to be extra nice when he explains why the argument doesn't hold water.


Replies

thisislife2today at 2:43 PM

Sadly, in many courts, when it comes to the corporate and the government, the judges rule on the axiom, "Show me your lawyer first, and I will rule, rather than show me the law, and I will rule".

dotancohentoday at 2:10 PM

It has been often said that a man who represents himself in court has a fool for a client.

show 1 reply
_heimdalltoday at 2:56 PM

Unless I'm mistaken, the relevant copyright laws aren't limited to enforcement when money exchanged hands.

show 1 reply
chonglitoday at 3:35 PM

maybe the judge will even try to be extra nice when he explains why the argument doesn't hold water.

Many judges take a dim view of expensive lawyers trying to pull the wool over their eyes with sophisticated but fallacious arguments. You have to deal with a lot of BS to be a long-standing judge, so it seems like resistance to BS may be selected for among judges.