That's the tricky part. Verifying that a company exists is relatively easy, but verifying that a role is genuinely open and accurately described is much harder.
I wonder if it would require a combination of signals — for example confirming the recruiter identity, requiring periodic confirmation that the role is still open, or feedback from applicants about whether the process actually happened.
I'm not sure how far that could go in practice, though.
That's the tricky part. Verifying that a company exists is relatively easy, but verifying that a role is genuinely open and accurately described is much harder. I wonder if it would require a combination of signals — for example confirming the recruiter identity, requiring periodic confirmation that the role is still open, or feedback from applicants about whether the process actually happened. I'm not sure how far that could go in practice, though.