logoalt Hacker News

magicalhippoyesterday at 9:09 PM10 repliesview on HN

The problem is that we might lose some gold.

Not too seldom have I seen the author or a significant party of a story chime in through a fresh green account, as they were alerted by the story being posted here one way or another. And usually when they do it's very interesting.

As such I would find it detrimental if they had to jump through too many hoops so they don't bother or it takes too long so the thread dies before they can participate.


Replies

dangtoday at 1:09 AM

Indeed. Here is a recent litmus test: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47051852. How can we filter the lightweight stuff while still benefiting from posts like these?

(a bit more about this at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47056384, with a reply from the OP)

show 6 replies
hinkleyyesterday at 10:18 PM

Responding from a new account is different from posting from a new account. You aren’t vetting people by making accounts have a minimum age to post articles. That’ll just cause people to make accounts before they need them.

Reddit has forums where you need a minimum karma to post to certain subreddits and that is typically upvotes on your comments, but it could also be upvotes on someone else’s moderated subreddit.

trinsic2yesterday at 9:47 PM

I think the right people will stick around. There is a certain kind of indivudal that has the paitence to understand that a system that restricts new accounts from post is a good thing. Of recent, there have been a lot of posters that come here from the open web just to try and slant opinion.

show 4 replies
Uvixyesterday at 9:18 PM

Seems like restricting posts but not comments from a fresh account would thread that needle pretty well?

show 3 replies
vova_hn2today at 1:24 AM

This problem can be solved by an invite/vouch for system.

New account can be invited or vouched for by an old account with good karma. If an account that you vouched for starts spamming and/or slopposting, you lose your vouching for abilities for a period of time or forever.

show 1 reply
moralestapiayesterday at 10:07 PM

Totally.

I don't think the solution is changing the dynamic but flagging, this site self-moderates quite well, aside from dang and tomhow's great work.

grapheneposteryesterday at 11:14 PM

Yes that is exactly what I just did, some of us are just getting around to having time to post

intendedtoday at 2:30 AM

These changes aren’t being suggested in a vacuum.

It’s perhaps unintentional, but your framing makes it seem that this is a baseless whimsy.

At this point, it appears that we will be talking to bots more than humans.

It’s a brave new world, and not adapting to it will see the humans leave.

8cvor6j844qw_d6yesterday at 11:28 PM

Honest question, what are the alternatives to HN?

Because if new account restrictions create enough friction, you lose legitimate users who periodically rotate accounts for privacy reasons.

At some point the annoyance tips toward just lurking, and a forum where only old accounts talk is a stagnant forum given enough time.

show 1 reply
kristopoloustoday at 1:26 AM

I think we've gone from the eternal September to the eternal December