alt Hacker NewsSure, but you are still supposed to clean things up to make the life of the reviewer easier.
There's an inherent tension between honest history and a polished 'lie' to make the reviewer's life easier.
Sure, but you are still supposed to clean things up to make the life of the reviewer easier.
There's an inherent tension between honest history and a polished 'lie' to make the reviewer's life easier.
The "honest" historical record of when I decided to use "git commit" while working on something is 100% useless for anyone but me (for me it's 90% useless).
git tracks revisions, not history of file changes.