alt Hacker News>IP laws can stay the same, but they should have purchased a license to use my art before including it in their training data.
But including your art in the training data is fair use (or otherwise exempt) by most standards, as no reproduction occurs. You are advocating for a change to IP law to make it more restrictive.
Replies
abustamam • today at 5:45 AM
Fair use by most standards? Which standards are those? I don't think a standard about training an AI on billions of images exists.
➕ show 1 reply
heavyset_go • today at 5:45 AM
No precedent has been set when it comes to training and fair use
throwawaysoxjje • today at 5:35 AM
Which case decided that?
bluefirebrand • today at 5:43 AM
> But including your art in the training data is fair use
It shouldn't be!
> But including your art in the training data is fair use
The four factors of fair use in the US:
> the purpose and character of your use
Commercial, for-profit. Not scholarship, not research, not commentary, not parody, etc.
> the nature of the copyrighted work
Absolutely everything. Artistic, creative, not purely factual.
> the amount and substantiality of the portion taken, and
All of it, from everyone.
> the effect of the use upon the potential market.
Directly competing with those whose data was copied.