logoalt Hacker News

Horatius77today at 12:17 AM5 repliesview on HN

Appears that it is trying to stimulate broad immunity .. instead of any one specific virus/disease. Artificial and overstimulation of our immune systems long-term can't be healthy. Definitely a tradeoff here.


Replies

gcanyontoday at 2:03 AM

> [greater activity within] our immune systems long-term can't be healthy

Not trying to be flip, but why? "Natural" isn't always better, and as the obesity epidemic has shown, our evolutionary past hasn't done a perfect job of preparing us for our current environment.

You might be right, but I'm skeptical that there is any non-extreme limit to something as simple and mechanical as our innate immune system.

show 3 replies
curtisftoday at 2:01 AM

It could also be useful in low doses to supplement, for example, a seasonal vaccine in a year where they are especially unsure about prevalent strains, or where their predictions were already proved wrong early in the flu season

butILoveLifetoday at 2:01 AM

Cant we say this applies to the flu vaccine? This almost validates why I skip it every year.

I get sick after getting the flu vaccine and feel pretty bad for 1-3 days... then I get the flu anyway because they picked the wrong ones.

show 1 reply
dioniantoday at 1:36 AM

you would think so! as a "vaccine skeptic", i think this kind of research is important and patients should be able to decide w/ their doctor which to pursue based on their individual condition. perhaps this tradeoff will be worth it in higher risk individuals.

show 1 reply