logoalt Hacker News

bee_ridertoday at 2:24 PM4 repliesview on HN

I don’t love the title here. Maybe this is a “me” problem, but when I see “AI agent does X,” the idea that it might be one of those molt-y agents with obfuscated ownership pops into my head.

In this case, a group of pentesters used an AI agent to select McKinsey and then used the AI agent to do the pentesting.

While it is conventional to attribute actions to inanimate objects (car hits pedestrians), IMO we should be more explicit these days, now that unfortunately some folks attribute agency to these agentic systems.


Replies

simonwtoday at 2:45 PM

Yeah, the original article title "How We Hacked McKinsey's AI Platform" is better.

dangtoday at 7:17 PM

Ok, we've reverted the title (submitted title was "AI Agent Hacks McKinsey")

tasukitoday at 2:58 PM

> now that unfortunately some folks attribute agency to these agentic systems.

You're doing that by calling them "agentic systems".

show 1 reply
causaltoday at 2:57 PM

Yah it's just an ad, and "Pentesting agents finds low-hanging vulnerability" isn't gonna drive clicks.

show 2 replies