The cover is a strange thing to judge a book by. SAIC isn't somehow worse because they couldn't think of a witty name 60 years ago. IBM couldn't either, nor General Motors. Basic descriptive names are actually pretty good compared to meaningless "Meta" or "Google" that have no idea what industry they even want to appear to be in.
>SAIC isn't somehow worse because they couldn't think of a witty name 60 years ago.
is "non-descript" an insult now, or something? where do you read "worse" in my comment?