I'm glad there's finally a coalition

But the coalition (is two nations really a coalition?) hasn't state regime change is the purpose of the war. Well, they did, and then changed their minds. Several times.

And, as I'm sure you're aware, knocking off the head of state in Iran doesn't necessarily move the needle on regime change. Dismantling the IRGC and removing the hardliners will be a long, dangerous operation and I doubt the US has the stomach for that. And Israel has already moved on to bombing Lebanon again.

I'm afraid the coalition has no idea what to do with the islamic regime in question. Unless it will be toppled from inside, the best the coalition can offer is more bombs (until it becomes too much of a strain for the budget).

Interesting. Is it desirable to have civil infrastructure destroyed by a foreign power?

More importantly, was having civil infrastructure destroyed ever, in any place in history, a catalyst for a "regime change"?

I really don't think Israel and the US care much about your people. Be careful with what you wish for. You just might get it.

[flagged]