I thought that line was kind of funny: When a CI run fails, you don't rerun it and wait for the result, you rerun it and check why the original run failed in the meantime. Is it flaky? Is it a pipeline issue? Connectivity issue? Did some Key expire?

If you just rerun and don't go to find out what exactly caused CI to fail, you end up at the author's conclusion:

> (but it could also just have been flaky again).