logoalt Hacker News

mooglyyesterday at 7:03 PM8 repliesview on HN

I think if you've been set for life since the late 90s/early 2000s and didn't really have to work another day in your life if you didn't want to, it's a lot easier to be cavalier about giving away some of your output from way back when.

He can easily afford to be altruistic in this regard.

But Carmack isn't wired for empathy; he has never been.


Replies

eltetoyesterday at 7:13 PM

Attack the argument not the man. Whether he is set for life or not has nothing to do _in this context_, since, presumably, people who open source their code do not care about profit.

show 11 replies
liuliuyesterday at 7:16 PM

GPL is not for you to make money. It is for the end-users to have freedom with their hardware.

If you want to make money, use a proper license.

To expand on this, GPL is not against capitalism neither. Sometimes, end-users' freedom with their hardware is good to make money on (they buy your support, to have confidence they can migrate from one hardware to another, or use their hardware way longer than the original manufacturer can stay in business). But it is also not an automated license to say "give me your money" neither.

pie_flavoryesterday at 7:25 PM

Oldheads are not the exclusive group of people who have ever meant actual altruism by their open-source licenses. You can't just pick an attribute to dismiss an opinion based on. Creative control over the lineage of a line of code is just not something the open source world is very concerned with in aggregate.

Anti-AI sentiment comes primarily from slop PRs (and slop projects) along with the water use hoax; copyright concerns originate almost entirely from the art sphere, crossing over into the open source sphere by osmosis and only representing a small minority of opinion-havers therein.

john_strinlaiyesterday at 7:10 PM

arguments are stronger without insults

show 1 reply
charcircuityesterday at 7:37 PM

If people need money they should seriously considering charging money for the software they make instead of giving it away for free and hoping it somehow becomes profitable.

GaryBlutoyesterday at 7:08 PM

> But Carmack isn't wired for empathy; he has never been.

What an utterly pretentious and rude thing to say.

show 1 reply
poszlemyesterday at 8:34 PM

Except him being wealthy could just as well be used to support the argument for using GPL instead of gifting. "He does not have to make real money off of it, he is privileged".