alt Hacker NewsSurprised Python is only 21x slower than C for tree traversal stuff. In my experience that's one of the most painful places to use Python. But maybe that's because I use numpy automatically when simple arrays are involved, and there's no easy path for trees.
Replies
AlotOfReading • today at 4:32 PM
You can turn trees into numpy-style matrix operations because graphs and matrices are two sides of the same coin. I don't see the code for the binary-tree benchmark in the repo to see how it's written, but there are libraries like graphblas that use the equivalence for optimization.
Be careful with that, numpy arrays can be slower than Python tuples for some operations. The creation is always slower and the overhead has to be worth it.