logoalt Hacker News

estearumyesterday at 6:54 PM5 repliesview on HN

Yes! Excellent work. Now there is no incentive for anyone to build housing for our growing population!


Replies

EGG_CREAMyesterday at 6:59 PM

I am a progressive government. The free market has failed to provide a necessary service. So now I pass a law that creates a not for profit contractor that builds houses. It’s not that complicated. We do it with fire departments, police, and many other services already. Free market might have been more efficient theoretically, but when it fails in practice we find another solution.

show 2 replies
rybosworldyesterday at 8:11 PM

Are you implying that landlords are naturally incentivized to build homes? Because in most circumstances, the exact opposite is true. In the U.S., the government has a number of programs that offer landlords vouchers in order to encourage them to build out more homes.

show 1 reply
PaulDavisThe1styesterday at 6:57 PM

Indeed, a critical problem. But wait ... what's that? You say there are places where the state builds housing? How could it be?

show 1 reply
UncleMeatyesterday at 8:06 PM

Of course there is an incentive to build housing. Developers build homes and then sell them to people who live in those homes.

show 1 reply
LightBug1yesterday at 8:52 PM

Did you just imply that landlords are incentivised to build housing for a growing population?! * scream laughs *

show 1 reply