logoalt Hacker News

somattoday at 1:46 AM2 repliesview on HN

It is a stupid law but I feel people are overthinking this.

For compliance the os has to provide an age category to an application and an interface for the user to enter this data. We already have an api to provide information to applications. it's called the filesystem. and an interface to enter the data, that's called the shell. so everything is already there. If the user lives in california and wants to be compliant (wait a minute, let me stop laughing) all they have to do is put a file somewhere with a age category in it. if the application can't find it. well it's not their fault the law is stupid.


Replies

LelouBiltoday at 2:05 AM

Yes people are overthinking.

Actually having a cross-distro way to specify an age group for parental control purposes would be very useful.

If the law starts to change and be about surveillance (which it isn't about _right now_) then distro maintainers will just not implement that.

show 1 reply
fainpultoday at 8:07 AM

You are underthinking this.

You described a technical solution to comply with this law. Yes, that's easy. The problem is the legal implications.