logoalt Hacker News

potrotoday at 7:17 AM2 repliesview on HN

There is quite a bit of difference between not making a profit and consistently losing around $100m a year with apparently no path to at least revenue neutrality.


Replies

rapnietoday at 7:20 AM

So it loses pocket change for a multi billionaire?

Edit: The consideration being that perhaps billionaire toys need not be profitable per se, but are purchased for different reasons. Twitter is another example here.

show 2 replies
surgical_firetoday at 9:46 AM

He could, you know, not have bought the newspaper too. It didn't belong to him originally.

It's not like he will make it profitable anyway.