logoalt Hacker News

jn6118yesterday at 9:45 AM4 repliesview on HN

This article really resonates with me and I'm somewhat relieved to see someone else feels the same way.

I love physical books for general reading and will often buy both physical and ebook format for technical books to get the best of both worlds.

I now cannot stand print-on-demand books and, like the author, I can spot them very quickly. The quality is abysmal, and I might as well be printing them myself at that point.

I too used to default to Amazon, as the price was often about 30% cheaper. However, I've come to realise that you get what you pay for. In the UK, I just buy from Waterstones or local bookshops, as then I can trust that it has likely come from the publisher or at least can inspect in advance.

I am never buying a book from Amazon again.


Replies

julianeontoday at 5:33 AM

Something I don't understand:

Why don't you buy used books?

Plenty of supply for a book like the one he mentions, Knut Hamsun's "Growth of the Soil." No question that it was made to the quality level of the time when it was published; early 2000's is probably peak.

I understand some books are so new they won't have any used copies. But for everything else, there's an endless buffet to choose from.

georgefrownyyesterday at 10:40 AM

It's also incredibly annoying that Amazon slurped up AbeBooks way back in 2008.

show 4 replies
GeoSysyesterday at 10:03 AM

Is there a way to filter out such books when you browse Amazon? They should at least tell you it's an "on-demand" printed book before you order?

show 5 replies
dyauspitrtoday at 6:28 AM

But why do print on demand books have to be low quality? It’s actually a pretty genius idea. You order a book, an automated machine prints out a high quality book indistinguishable from a regular paperback, pops it into a box and it’s ready for shipping. You could probably print one in under 5 minutes, no fees to store the books, you could have 10 times the “published” authors.

show 2 replies