logoalt Hacker News

dzogchenyesterday at 3:08 PM6 repliesview on HN

I don't really understand what the value proposition of Bun and Deno is. And I see huge problems with their governance and long-term sustainability.

Node.js on the other hand is not owned or controlled by one entity. It is not beholden to the whims of investors or a large corporation. I have contributed to Node.js in the past and I was really impressed by its rock-solid governance model and processes. I think this an under-appreciated feature when evaluating tech options.


Replies

packetlostyesterday at 3:14 PM

Deno has some pretty nice unique features like sandboxing that, afaik, don't exist in other runtimes (yet). It's enough of a draw that it's the recommended runtime for projects like yt-dlp: https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/14404

show 1 reply
zamadatixyesterday at 3:57 PM

If one gets nothing from them directly, they've at least been a good kick to get several features into Node. It's almost like neovim was to vim, perhaps to a lesser extent.

zadikianyesterday at 5:06 PM

Note that Bun was recently acquired by Anthropic.

gavmoryesterday at 5:00 PM

Faster, no transpilation, dev-ex sugar.

pier25yesterday at 4:24 PM

I agree about the governance and long-term sustainability points but if you don't see any value in Bun or Deno is probably because (no offense) you are not paying attention.