logoalt Hacker News

charcircuityesterday at 4:39 PM2 repliesview on HN

It would be considered (a) since the author would own the copyright on the code.


Replies

lacooljyesterday at 5:22 PM

Owning copyright of something and writing it are very different things

show 1 reply
croteyesterday at 4:51 PM

Citation needed.

Whether AI output can fall under copyright at all is still up for debate - with some early rulings indicating that the fact that you prompted the AI does not automatically grant you authorship.

Even if it does, it hasn't been settled yet what the impact of your AI having been trained on copyrighted material is on its output. You can make a not-completely-unreasonable argument that AI inference output is a derivative work of AI training input.

Fact is, the matter isn't settled yet, which means any open-source project should assume the worst possible outcome - which in practice means a massive AI-generated PR like this should be treated like a nuke which could go off at any moment.

show 3 replies