logoalt Hacker News

citrin_rutoday at 2:36 PM1 replyview on HN

AFAIK performance is not a priority for OpenBSD project - security is (and other related qualities like code which is easy to understand and maintain). FreeBSD (at least when I followed it several years ago) had better performance both for ipfw and its own PF fork (not fully compatible with OpenBSD one).


Replies

traceroute66today at 3:07 PM

> AFAIK performance is not a priority for OpenBSD project - security is

TBF that was the case historically, but they have absolutely been putting in an effort into performance in their more recent releases.

Lots of stuff that used to be simply horrific on OpenBSD, such as multi-peer BGP full-table refreshes is SIGNIFICANTLY better in the last couple of years.

Clearly still not as good as FreeBSD, but compared to what it was...