> Let’s bring data:
> Source: ChatGPT
Please tell me this is a joke?
I agree and have the same reaction, but I also wonder how long before we accept "ChatGPT" source like we do Wikipedia.
For ChatGpt answers we reasonably expect to cite actual sources rather than "Source: ChatGPT".
For Wikipedia, most of us just stop at "Source: Wikipedia".
Why? Do you have different data or you just don’t like the numbers?
- https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/07/24/key-facts...
- https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/06/22/guns-an...
- https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/75-006-x/2025001/article...