logoalt Hacker News

jlduggeryesterday at 9:33 PM2 repliesview on HN

> the data showed that on summit night, the average body temperature difference between the twin in modern down and the twin in complicated layers of silk, wool, and gabardine was a staggering 1.8°C. > “In a hundred years, you’ve gained—arguably—one degree of efficiency per 50 years,” Ross reveals.

Depending on where the baseline is, 1.8 degrees could be huge! But more importantly, heat dissapation is a non-linear function. The warmer you are relative to your environment, the more energy is lost. While Shackleton's kit forms a lower baseline, it probably makes sense to imagine how some imaginary perfect vacuum insulated sleeping bag would perform.


Replies

Aurornisyesterday at 10:07 PM

Is that really core body temperature?

Normal core body temperature is around 37C.

Hypothermia starts around 35C, only 2C less.

If they're actually measuring body temperature (using that swallowed pill they mention?) then 1.8C is a huge difference.

This whole article does feel like they started with a conclusion and they were going to report that conclusion regardless of what they measured or experienced. Content that claims to debunk things is hot right now.

show 1 reply
margalabargalayesterday at 9:41 PM

This whole article is kind of a straw man anyway.

Warmth of clothing isn't actually what people care about. What people care about, and what the article does not mention, is warmth per unit weight.

show 3 replies