logoalt Hacker News

FridayoLearyyesterday at 9:46 PM1 replyview on HN

The evidence shows they don't have sufficient control. Parents these days clearly are unequal to the task, i'm passing no judgement just observing.

>We don't put protections on kids walking out the front door

My view is that we most certainly ban and/or heavily discourage children from entering certain places and talking to random strangers. There are many safeguards in the real world, there is simply not enough in the internet.

I don't say this lightly. I am very firmly against the nanny state, and i feel equally strongly in parental rights. I've made comments in the past against these laws but i feel it's the only way forward. The only question that remains is how to best implement such policies to minimize the inevitable erosion of our privacy.

I don't like it, but that's how it is.


Replies

ranger_dangeryesterday at 10:14 PM

> The evidence shows they don't have sufficient control.

What evidence is that? Who gets to say what's sufficient?

Unless there is a high probability that an alleged lack of control will negatively other people than the family in question, I don't think it should be the government's business to police.