logoalt Hacker News

Retricyesterday at 9:58 PM3 repliesview on HN

Not tightly coupled in obvious ways, but as I understand it they aren’t putting it on pickup trucks, convertibles, or anything toeing a boat etc. Their vehicles don’t have aftermarket suspension systems dramatically changing handling characteristics, or turned one into a stretched limo etc.

Which means the software can safely assume the vehicle will behave within a relatively narrow operating range.


Replies

maxericksonyesterday at 11:06 PM

I suppose owners will be motivated to have the thing do the driving (and so seek defeat devices and such), but at least the software can have "do nothing" as a safety mode if it manages to detect that the vehicle is not configured as expected.

And maybe the software can be designed to be coupled to a vehicle dynamics model that can be updated.

cucumber3732842yesterday at 11:22 PM

I don't think the vehicle performance really matters in the typical case. They're using like 20% of what the vehicle "can" do. They're probably hedging against the long tail of variance on the road somehow. Kinda like how private people can tow whatever the f they want with their pickups but in a work setting you need to keep it fairly stupid proof.

jeffbeeyesterday at 10:01 PM

The only thing an autonomous system should do with janky modified cars is drive them very slowly to the state police barracks for destruction.

show 1 reply