> So, how about responding to a point I made in this thread, today, instead of a post made by "someone on HN a few years back?"

It was only a counterexample to illustrate my point. I did address your point in general, that your assertion that "everybody wants to lose their jobs" is both tone-deaf and false.

> We can't reach post-scarcity without AI

Maybe. But more importantly, it doesn't explain away people's justified fears.