logoalt Hacker News

butILoveLifetoday at 1:52 PM10 repliesview on HN

This would hit harder if Bitcoin didn't win and AI coding didn't completely change our jobs.

Why not simply evaluate things instead of ignoring them until its too late?

Sure, we don't have infinity time, but the fact that OP mentions these two things, means the pattern showed up enough.


Replies

techblueberrytoday at 1:56 PM

What is too late? If you want to use cryptocurrency as a medium of exchange, go ahead, it’s right there!

There’s this irony to the FOMO in crypto, which is people argue the “sensible” thing (it’s the future of money) to create FOMO for the insensible thing (it’s a lottery ticket). You’re right it’s too late to buy a lottery ticket, but the vision wasn’t a lottery, it was a medium of exchange!

AI assisted coding is the same way. I use it every day, but if I decided to stop and wait a year, I could still pick it up, probably more easily when the tools are better.

In fact, people who wait might do better than me because their mental model won’t be locked into a way of interacting that will be out of date in six months.

Wouldn’t it be ironic if all the early adopters were the losers because they liked the hacky nature of it? This happened to a lot of early computer adopters, low level programmers, etc.

show 1 reply
mehagartoday at 1:56 PM

You make it seem like AI coding has already "totally changed" our jobs. This is exactly the FOMO the article talks about ("until its too late"). It hasn't. I'm still using the same workflows without AI tools, and so are most of my teammates.

show 1 reply
cryptonymtoday at 2:07 PM

Crypto didn't "win", the technology is there but people are mostly gambling, or doing shady stuff. Shall I mention NFTs? It didn't change the life of the average joe, nor business. It's a niche.

Many people are still coding without AI and doing perfectly fine. When you design serious things, coding is not where most time is spent anyway. Maybe it'll become unavoidable at some point, by that time the experience will be refined and it'll be easier to learn.

Point is, it's never too late. If you don't need to be cutting edge on a new tech, it may not make sense to put the extra effort of early birds. If you put that effort, you better not do it for free.

fdghrtbrttoday at 2:01 PM

"if bitcoin didn't win?" It didn't win. It's still useless.

show 2 replies
randomsolutionstoday at 1:57 PM

He is rejecting the framing of get in now before it's "too late". If it is so useful then we will be able to pick it up when it is more polished rather than learning to use some half polished turd that will be obsolete in 6 months.

master-lincolntoday at 2:01 PM

What did bitcoin win? Seems to me like it's mainly used as speculative asset instead of using it to pay goods and services.

eugenekolotoday at 1:55 PM

I'm not sure Bitcoin won.. it just continues being a ponzi scheme that you can make money in.

You can also accept that certain things and be happy in life either way. Don't need to chase get rich schemes. Some are more privileged than others in being able to do this.

lpcvoidtoday at 1:57 PM

Bitcoin won? I don't think it did. Main use is still scams, circumventing sanctions, and grifting. My SEPA instant money transfer does everything bitcoin promised without the trash, and bad people surrounding bitcoin.

monegatortoday at 2:00 PM

daily reminder your have yet to start paying for using LLMs, the current paid tiers are just to lure you in.

It also has changed nothing in the way i do stuff. Checked it out, not for me, thanks but no thanks

(Sick and tired of hearing how you made an ui in a couple of hours by directing the code when it still takes me the same couple of hours of coding.)