I mean, whatever, man.

This line, as one example:

> For every HTML 2.0 you might have tried, you were just as likely to have got stuck in the dead-end of Flash.

Like a lot of tech Flash had its moment in the sun and then faded away, but that “moment” lasted a decade, and plenty of people got their start because of or built successful businesses around it. Did they have to pivot as Flash waned? Sure, but change is part of life.

I’m sorry but I find the take expressed in this piece to be absolutely miserable and uninspiring.

But, hey, congratulations on the 20:20 hindsight, I suppose.