alt Hacker NewsThe article suggests something like 90% of their spend was intended to change results. Can you help me understand your comment? I don’t get it.
Replies
vasco • today at 5:36 PM
He means in politics you don't need to bet on the winning horse, you can just bribe him after he wins. Or bet on both.
➕ show 1 reply
They are saying that was a bad strategy and not the usual one. I have no idea to what extent that’s true.