The linked blog contains a story about who funds archive today and they presumably don’t like being exposed.
Thanks. I am so confused by this social drama, I feel like I am getting too old for this.
You mean just to keep their secrets hidden they hurt others?
well that exposing is hurting more than 2 for sure
The crucial context here is that archive.today provides a useful public service for free.
Jani Patokallio runs gyrovague.net in order to harass people who provide useful public services.
It's not surprising that the owner of archive.today does not like being exposed, archiving is a risky business.