logoalt Hacker News

noutyesterday at 7:56 PM7 repliesview on HN

In the meantime systemd already added handling for Age to the system bus. Next step is to add your race, then income, then who you voted for...


Replies

crimsonnoodle58yesterday at 9:29 PM

Why? Why should Linux ever implement local laws like this as core functionality? Especially invasive/anti-privacy ones.

If someone wants to introduce an age-verification-ca-module, fine, but not make it core. Yes I understand systemd is not the kernel, but its ubiquitous enough.

That just says to every country around the world; Windows, Mac, and even Linux is on board too, let's make it law also!

I dunno, I always expected Linux to be the last bastion of freedom and not to capitulate so easily.

show 3 replies
Muromecyesterday at 8:51 PM

Finally we can set the evil bit correctly on a kernel level.

iugtmkbdfil834yesterday at 8:56 PM

That is ok. The writing was on the wall for a while. It is time to let it go. It served its purpose. We might as well start mapping out a way without it in a more serious way out of sheer necessity. I know I am.

enointyesterday at 11:39 PM

Nit: introducing a user account field is not the same as the system bus. It’s in ~/.identity and might be absent altogether.

drnick1yesterday at 9:44 PM

I don't see what prevents anyone (e.g., a distro maintainer) from patching that anti-feature out of the source or disabling with with root access. As long as people can control the software running on their machines, which is the idea behind Linux, nothing that people don't actually want will stay in the system.

Systemd shouldn't be foisting this nonsense on Linux users however. I suppose the anti-systemd subset of the Linux community was proven right after all, this is the kind of issue that can end up facing when a huge piece of opinionated software like systemd more or less becomes an indispensable part of Linux.

joe_mambayesterday at 8:00 PM

Western tech direction in the last 5 years:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXL-r8deB5o

show 1 reply
alexdnsyesterday at 9:25 PM

it was reverted ?

show 1 reply