Your arguments show a lack of the least imagination, let alone simple reasoning.

There are countless ways to satisfy any regulation while still doing whatever you actually want to do.

The very most obvious is simply sell the device, in the affected areas, with any sort of os that meets the letter of the law in that area.

If it's also easy for the user to install something else once it becomes their property, well that's the new owner's business atthat point, Motorola did their part and complied with everything required.

No one needs to demand a company violate anything. That is just a silly argument to even try to make. Calling people insane for things they never said nor even implied is what's insane.