> That means the lock-in isn’t just product strategy. It’s also architecture.
> And that omission isn’t some harmless simplification. It’s the entire trick.
It isn't just once. It's—twice. ;)
Also stuff like this:
>That’s not exotic. That’s just model parallelism with extra suffering.
>That’s not product magic. That’s a checkbox.
What really triggers my internal AI slop detector is this:
>Their renders. Their prototype shots. Their exploded views. Their spec sheet.
>Nobody asked what silicon was inside. Nobody asked how 120B on LPDDR5X was supposed to work. Nobody spent
>No cloud. No GPU. No subscriptions.
>wrong class of chip, wrong power envelope, wrong everything
>The visual geometry matches. The licensing model matches. The China-based semiconductor ecosystem match
>Real researchers. Real papers. Real contributions.
LLMs love to overuse this pattern.
Oof, thanks! (I'm going to blame it on my Android Chrome "find in page" tool not working as expected, and I apologize)