>You didn't. You did a false dichotomy, then both-sides'd your argument. Presumably "hack back" being one side, and J6s the other. I'm likening "hack back" to BLM

So saying that political violence is bad, and pointing out an example where the other side did political violence is "both-sides"?

>We should all be on the "side" of being against blatant abuse of power, when we actually see it.

Again, you haven't answered my question. It sounds like you wouldn't have any issue with Jan 6th if Trump wasn't involved, and it was just grassroots election denialism.

>People should legally be allowed to say whatever they want but

No, I specifically referring to "veiled reference to the french revolution", which implies some sort of political violence, not just something like BLM protests.