logoalt Hacker News

sublinearyesterday at 11:46 PM1 replyview on HN

Yeah and what's stopping someone from drinking while borrowing someone else's car? Oh they don't want their car wrecked too? They may just drive the drunk to work then.

We arrive at the same place with the same real solutions (the people). The technology doesn't do anything except add extra steps and convince the public something was done.

If anything it creates enough hassle for the offender that new crimes are being committed with harsher consequences (domestic abuse), or dragging additional people into crime they didn't intend (negligent entrustment).


Replies

array_key_firsttoday at 12:36 AM

> We arrive at the same place with the same real solutions (the people)

This is always the case. There will always be murderers, and thieves. But technology just helps.

There are real solutions, and fake ones. Fake solutions include "make people not bad anymore". This just doesn't work, there will always be alcoholics, end of.

If there was less of a reliance on cars, there would be less drunk driving. We take drunk driving as a necessary consequence of transportation, but that's just not true. And, if we had less of a reliance on cars, we could actually suspend licenses sooner.

But as it currently stands, we cannot. We would just be permanently fucking people over in such a severe and unnecessary manner. Being unable to drive is one of the most reliable ways to become homeless in many parts of the US. This will only lead to more crime.

show 1 reply