logoalt Hacker News

jacoopertoday at 10:34 AM4 repliesview on HN

Macs are too expensive for the same performance/ram, and Linux still can't run proper creative software.


Replies

maxnoetoday at 10:40 AM

"Most companies still do not publish Linux builds for creative software"

There, fixed it for you.

It's not like Linux is the blocker here.

show 1 reply
yourusernametoday at 10:43 AM

This used to be the case but looking at Macbooks now they are not much more expensive than a Windows laptop you would actually want to buy. And since they will still have some residual value 5 years from now i think it's about even.

show 3 replies
nunodonatotoday at 10:42 AM

are you a creative professional? because I see that argument quite often as if people use Adobe CS daily, and then its mostly people who do basic stuff (that photopea or gimp can handle fine), but they like to feel "pro" by launching their pirated version of photoshop.

show 2 replies
troupotoday at 10:39 AM

> Macs are too expensive for the same performance/ram

This hasn't been true for at least a decade. And it's especially not true for the M* series Macs.

Even Macbook Neo can handle editing several layers of 4k video files in several apps while running everything else https://youtu.be/Mo6o8RKn7jE?is=opeCYMDbt7bUAdvS Try that on "the same performance/ram" Windows Machine